Practice English with NewsPractice with News
PoliticsBusiness342 words3 min read

Greens Propose $25bn Plan to Make Supermarkets Public

0:00 / 0:00

Listen to the story

Max Chandler-Mather, a former Greens member of parliament who now heads the Greens Institute, has pitched an ambitious $25bn plan to nationalise 200 supermarkets currently operated by Coles and Woolworths, Australia's two dominant grocery chains.

The proposal, which echoes similar ideas put forward by New York politician Zohran Mamdani, calls for the federal government to purchase and run a network of publicly owned stores designed to compete directly with the existing private duopoly.

Chandler-Mather argues that the scheme would ease cost-of-living pressures by offering consumers a lower-cost alternative for everyday groceries. He contends that Coles and Woolworths have used their dominant market position to keep prices higher than necessary, a claim that has fuelled ongoing public debate about supermarket pricing in Australia.

Under the plan, the government would take ownership of 200 stores at an estimated cost of $25bn, creating a state-run chain intended to challenge the pricing practices of the two major retailers. Supporters of such models argue that publicly run businesses, freed from the pressure to deliver profits to shareholders, can pass savings directly on to customers.

The approach draws explicit inspiration from Mamdani's platform in New York, where he has floated comparable publicly owned grocery initiatives as a way to tackle rising food costs in American cities. Chandler-Mather's version adapts this concept to the Australian context, where Coles and Woolworths together hold a commanding market share of grocery sales.

It remains unclear whether the plan has gained traction beyond the Greens Institute or whether it will be formally introduced as legislation in parliament. The proposal has not yet been addressed by the major parties, nor by Coles or Woolworths themselves.

Critics of supermarket consolidation in Australia have long argued that the dominance of a small number of large chains limits competition and keeps prices elevated for consumers. Whether a nationalisation scheme of this scale could be practically or politically achieved remains an open question, but the proposal adds a bold new idea to the ongoing national conversation about grocery affordability and corporate power in the retail sector.

Vocabulary7 words

proposal
an idea suggested for others to consider
duopoly
when two companies control most of a market
ease
to make a problem smaller or less serious
profits
money a company makes above its costs
market share
the part of total sales one company controls
consolidation
when a few big companies take over most of a market
legislation
an official law or proposed law

๐Ÿ“š Ready to use these words in a real conversation?

Practice live with a real tutor on Preply.

Preply โ€” learn a language with a live tutor

Quiz

1. What does Chandler-Mather's $25bn plan propose?
2. According to the article, why might publicly owned stores offer lower prices?
3. True or False: The plan has already been passed as law in Australia's parliament.

โœ… Nice work on the quiz!

Keep the momentum going โ€” book a live English lesson with a Preply tutor.

Preply โ€” learn a language with a live tutor

Discussion questions

  1. Do you think nationalising supermarkets could actually lower grocery prices? Why or why not?
  2. What are the potential risks or downsides of a government running a supermarket chain?
  3. How does market dominance by a small number of companies affect prices and consumer choice?
  4. Should ideas like this one, inspired by politicians in other countries, be adapted to different national contexts? What challenges might arise?

๐ŸŽ“ Enjoyed this story?

Turn today's reading into real speaking practice with a live Preply tutor.

Preply โ€” learn a language with a live tutor, 50% off

More Politics stories

Next story ยท Difficult

Trump Shares Senator's Phone Number Over Daylight Saving Bill

โ†’