Practice English with NewsPractice with News
Politics298 words2 min read

Spain's Top Judge Criticises Supreme Court Over Amnesty Law

man in black suit jacket
Photo by Victoriano Izquierdo on Unsplash
0:00 / 0:00

Listen to the story

The president of Spain's Constitutional Court, Conde-Pumpido, has strongly criticised the Supreme Court's reading of the country's amnesty law, saying it runs "contrary to the spirit and purpose" of the legislation.

According to reports, Conde-Pumpido went further, describing the Supreme Court's interpretation as simply "contrary to the law."

The amnesty law was designed to address legal cases connected to the 'procés', the movement for Catalan independence that took place several years earlier.

Despite the Constitutional Court president's criticism, the Supreme Court is expected to apply the amnesty law immediately, according to the summary of events.

This is likely to accelerate the return of Carles Puigdemont, the former Catalan leader who has lived outside Spain since the independence push.

The same application of the law is expected to lead to the rehabilitation of all individuals who were convicted in connection with the 'procés'.

Rehabilitation, in this legal context, refers to the restoration of rights and legal standing that these individuals lost following their convictions.

The clash between Conde-Pumpido and the Supreme Court highlights an ongoing tension between Spain's top judicial bodies over how the amnesty law should be understood and enforced.

The Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court occupy different positions within Spain's legal system, and disagreements between them are not unprecedented, though this dispute concerns a particularly sensitive political issue.

The amnesty law itself has been a subject of intense debate in Spanish politics since it was first proposed, largely because of its direct connection to the Catalan independence crisis.

With the Supreme Court now moving to implement the law swiftly, attention will turn to how the case of Puigdemont and other convicted individuals proceeds in the coming period.

The broader implications of this judicial disagreement for Spain's political stability remain to be seen.

Vocabulary7 words

Constitutional Court
the top court that checks if laws match the constitution
Supreme Court
a very high court that decides important legal cases
amnesty
an official decision that stops legal punishment for certain acts
interpretation
a particular way of explaining or understanding a law
'procés'
the Catalan movement seeking independence from Spain
rehabilitation
getting back rights or status lost after a conviction
convicted
officially declared guilty of a crime by a court

📚 Ready to use these words in a real conversation?

Practice live with a real tutor on Preply.

Preply — learn a language with a live tutor

Quiz

1. What did Conde-Pumpido claim about the Supreme Court's interpretation of the amnesty law?
2. What effect is the Supreme Court's swift application of the amnesty law expected to have?
3. True or False: The dispute described is between Spain's Constitutional Court and Supreme Court.

✅ Nice work on the quiz!

Keep the momentum going — book a live English lesson with a Preply tutor.

Preply — learn a language with a live tutor, 50% off

Discussion questions

  1. What tensions can arise when two high courts interpret the same law differently?
  2. Why might an amnesty law tied to a political movement be especially controversial?
  3. What could be the political consequences of Puigdemont's return to Spain?
  4. How important is judicial independence in resolving disputes like this one?

🎓 Enjoyed this story?

Turn today's reading into real speaking practice with a live Preply tutor.

Preply — learn a language with a live tutor

More Politics stories