Spain's Supreme Court Keeps Suspension on Voting Rights for 'Grandchildren's Law'
Spain's Supreme Court has upheld its decision to suspend voting rights for people who obtained Spanish citizenship under the so-called 'grandchildren's law', ahead of an election scheduled for 29 November.
The law in question allows grandchildren of Spaniards who emigrated to claim Spanish nationality, a measure that has led to a significant number of new naturalisations in recent years.
The court had previously ordered a suspension of voting rights for those naturalised under this law, and it has now confirmed that this suspension will remain in effect for the upcoming vote.
In its reasoning, the court pointed to concerns about the integrity of the electoral register, the official list used to determine who is eligible to cast a ballot.
Specifically, the judges stated that the risk of the register being formed irregularly "continues to persist", according to the court's statement.
An irregular formation of the register would mean that the process used to add new voters to the list may not have followed required legal procedures correctly.
The court did not, according to the available summary, provide further detailed technical explanation of the specific irregularities feared, beyond reaffirming that the risk remains unresolved.
This ruling effectively means that individuals who gained Spanish nationality through the 'grandchildren's law' will be excluded from participating in the 29 November election.
The decision represents a confirmation rather than a reversal, as the Supreme Court had already imposed the original suspension before this latest statement.
Cases involving the 'grandchildren's law' have drawn attention in Spain because of the scale of nationality applications submitted by descendants of Spanish emigrants living abroad.
While the law has expanded access to citizenship for many eligible applicants, this judicial decision illustrates that citizenship status and voting eligibility are not always granted simultaneously.
The court's intervention highlights ongoing legal questions about how newly naturalised citizens are incorporated into the electoral system.
No additional information was provided regarding potential appeals or further judicial steps that might follow this ruling.
The situation remains specific to the 29 November election, and it is not clear from available information whether the suspension could affect future votes as well.
Vocabulary7 words
- Supreme Court
- the highest and most important court in a country
- citizenship
- official membership of a country, with rights like voting
- suspension
- the act of stopping something for a period of time
- electoral register
- the official list of people allowed to vote
- irregularly
- not done in the correct or legal way
- naturalisation
- the legal process of becoming a citizen of a country
- ruling
- an official decision made by a court
Quiz
Answer key
1. The suspension of voting rights for those naturalised under the 'grandchildren's law' 2. That it could be formed irregularly 3. True
โ Nice work on the quiz!
Keep the momentum going โ book a live English lesson with a Preply tutor.
Discussion questions
- Why might a court be concerned about how an electoral register is formed?
- What challenges can arise when integrating newly naturalised citizens into a country's voting system?
- Do you think citizenship and voting rights should always be granted together? Why or why not?
- What effects might this kind of ruling have on people who recently gained citizenship through family heritage laws?
๐ Enjoyed this story?
Turn today's reading into real speaking practice with a live Preply tutor.

