Practice English with NewsPractice with News
TravelPolitics372 words3 min read

Government Plans to End Extra Fees for Families Sitting Together on Flights

brown wooden blocks on white surface
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
0:00 / 0:00

Listen to the story

The UK government has outlined plans to end airline practices that allow extra charges for parents wanting to sit next to their children during flights. The move is aimed at easing financial pressure on families who currently face additional fees simply to secure seats together.

According to the government, the cost of guaranteeing a seat next to a child can reach ยฃ104 on a return journey under current airline pricing systems. This figure has drawn criticism from campaigners who argue that families should not be financially penalised for wanting to stay together during travel.

Under many existing airline models, basic ticket prices do not automatically include seat selection. Instead, passengers are often required to pay a separate fee if they want to choose or guarantee a particular seat, including one next to a travelling companion. Critics argue that this practice disproportionately affects families, who may have little choice but to pay in order to ensure children are seated beside a guardian.

The proposed changes form part of a broader government effort to strengthen protections for airline passengers and address what some officials have described as unfair pricing practices in the aviation industry. Although full details of the plan have not yet been published, the government has signalled an intention to prevent airlines from charging extra specifically for family seating arrangements.

Supporters of the proposal argue that sitting together is not merely a matter of convenience but also one of safety, particularly for younger children who may need adult supervision during a flight. Some have also suggested that current seat-selection charges function as a hidden source of revenue for airlines, rather than reflecting any additional operational cost.

The government has not yet confirmed a timeline for when the new rules might come into force, nor has it specified how compliance would be monitored or enforced across the industry. It also remains unclear whether the policy would apply uniformly to all carriers or only to certain types of fares.

Airlines themselves have not issued a public response to the proposal at this stage. Industry observers suggest that any changes could prompt wider discussion about how airlines price optional extras, which have become an increasingly significant part of airline revenue models in recent years.

Vocabulary7 words

fees
amounts of money charged for a service
return
a trip there and then back again
guardian
an adult responsible for a child
passengers
people travelling on a plane
revenue
money a company earns
carriers
companies that transport people, like airlines
aviation
the business of flying planes

๐Ÿ“š Ready to use these words in a real conversation?

Practice live with a real tutor on Preply.

Preply โ€” learn a language with a live tutor

Quiz

1. What is the main goal of the government's proposed change?
2. According to the article, why do critics say current seat fees are unfair?
3. True or false: The government has confirmed an exact date for when the new rules will begin.

โœ… Nice work on the quiz!

Keep the momentum going โ€” book a live English lesson with a Preply tutor.

Preply โ€” learn a language with a live tutor

Discussion questions

  1. Do you think seat-selection fees are a fair way for airlines to generate revenue?
  2. How might this policy change affect airline pricing strategies overall?
  3. What challenges might the government face in enforcing this kind of rule across different airlines?
  4. Should safety concerns for children be enough reason to guarantee free family seating, in your opinion?

๐ŸŽ“ Enjoyed this story?

Turn today's reading into real speaking practice with a live Preply tutor.

Preply โ€” learn a language with a live tutor

More Travel stories

Next story ยท Difficult

Australia: New Rules for Students, and Change at eSafety Agency

โ†’