Practice English with NewsPractice with News
Entertainment304 words2 min read

FDA Sends Notice to Bollywood Stars Over Vimal Elaichi Ad

A hollywood clapperboard on a yellow background
Photo by Luan Fonseca on Unsplash
0:00 / 0:00

Listen to the story

India's Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a formal notice to Bollywood actors Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff, asking them to explain their endorsement of Vimal chewing elaichi within 15 days.

The notice was signed by Tukaram Mundhe, a senior FDA official, and demands that the three stars justify their involvement in the advertisement for the product, which is a form of flavoured cardamom preparation popular in India.

This is not the first time the FDA has scrutinised celebrity promotion of the product. Actor Akshay Kumar previously endorsed the same brand before withdrawing from the campaign after facing significant public backlash.

Critics have long argued that chewing elaichi products, though not classified as tobacco, can normalise similar chewing habits and are marketed in ways that appeal to younger audiences.

The involvement of high-profile actors in such endorsements has repeatedly drawn criticism from health advocates and members of the public, who argue that celebrities carry significant influence over consumer behaviour.

By sending notices directly to Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff, the FDA appears to be signalling a stricter approach toward enforcing accountability among public figures who promote such products.

None of the three actors has yet issued a public statement in response to the notice, and it remains unclear how they will address the FDA's demand for clarification.

The case has attracted considerable attention in Indian media, given the actors' widespread popularity and their frequent appearances in high-value advertising campaigns across multiple industries.

Legal and industry observers suggest that the outcome of this notice could set a precedent for how regulatory bodies handle celebrity advertising for similar consumer products in the future.

As the 15-day deadline approaches, attention will likely remain on whether the actors respond publicly or quietly comply with the FDA's request for an explanation.

Vocabulary7 words

notice
an official letter asking for information or action
advertisement
a message used to sell a product
withdrawing
stopping involvement in something
backlash
strong negative reaction from many people
endorsement
public support for a product by a well-known person
accountability
being responsible for one's actions
precedent
an earlier case used as an example for future ones

Quiz

1. What did the FDA ask the three actors to do?
2. Who previously withdrew from endorsing the same product?
3. True or False: The FDA's notice may influence how future celebrity endorsements are regulated.

Discussion questions

  1. Do you think celebrities should be held responsible for the products they advertise? Why or why not?
  2. Why might public backlash influence a celebrity's decision to quit an advertising campaign?
  3. How much influence do you think celebrity endorsements have on consumer choices, especially among young people?
  4. Should governments regulate advertisements for products like chewing elaichi more strictly? Explain your view.

More Entertainment stories