Trump Cancels Nearly $1bn in Funding Approved by Congress
Listen to the story
The Trump administration has cancelled nearly $1 billion in federal spending that Congress had previously approved. The White House used a rarely applied legal power to do this.
According to reports, the White House has ordered more than $800 million in funds to be rescinded. A rescission means taking back money after it has already been agreed and set aside.
Normally, once Congress approves spending, the money is meant to be used for its intended purpose. However, the administration has claimed special authority to reverse some of these decisions.
This move has caused strong reactions in Washington. Senator Susan Collins has called the cancellation a 'clear violation' of the law, suggesting the White House has overstepped its powers.
Collins is a senior lawmaker who often works on budget issues, so her criticism carries weight among her colleagues in Congress.
The Constitution gives Congress control over federal spending, a power sometimes called the 'power of the purse'. Critics argue this action challenges that balance of power.
Supporters of the move may argue that the administration has the right to manage federal money more carefully, though the summary provided does not include their comments.
It remains unclear exactly which programs lost funding, as full details have not yet been confirmed. The dispute could lead to further political and possibly legal battles over who truly controls government spending.
This story is still developing, and more information may emerge about the specific funds affected and how Congress plans to respond.
Vocabulary10 words
- funds
- money set aside for a purpose
- rescinded
- officially taken back or cancelled
- authority
- official power to make decisions
- violation
- breaking of a law or rule
- budget
- a plan for how money will be spent
- Constitution
- the main set of rules for a country's government
- administration
- the government team led by a president
- lawmaker
- a person who helps create laws
- federal
- relating to the national government
- overstepped
- gone beyond allowed limits
Quiz
Answer key
1. It cancelled funding Congress had approved 2. It was a clear violation of the law 3. True
โ Nice work on the quiz!
Keep the momentum going โ book a live English lesson with a Preply tutor.
Fill-in-the-blank listening
Play the audio again and fill in the missing words as you listen.
The Trump administration has cancelled nearly $1 billion in federal _____ that Congress had previously approved.
The White House used a rarely applied legal _____ to do this.
The White House has ordered more than $800 million in funds to be _____.
A rescission means taking back money after it has already been _____ and set aside.
The administration has claimed special _____ to reverse some of these decisions.
Senator Susan Collins has called the cancellation a 'clear _____' of the law.
Collins is a senior _____ who often works on budget issues.
The Constitution gives Congress control over federal spending, sometimes called the 'power of the _____'.
It remains unclear exactly which _____ lost funding.
The dispute could lead to further political and possibly legal battles over who truly controls government _____.
Discussion questions
- Why do you think the White House cancelled funding that Congress had already approved?
- Do you agree with Senator Collins that this action was a 'clear violation' of the law?
- How important is it for one branch of government to have control over spending decisions?
- What might happen next if Congress disagrees with the White House's decision?
More Politics stories
Next story ยท Medium
Football News: Manchester City Verdict and England v Spain Buildup
