Nvidia Boss: No Chance AI Will Destroy the World by 2030
Listen to the story
Jensen Huang, the head of the chip company Nvidia, has strongly rejected warnings that artificial intelligence could destroy the world by 2030.
Huang said there is a '0% chance' of this happening. He described such warnings as 'doomsday narratives' that are not based on reality.
The warnings have come from several people, including a former researcher at Anthropic, a company that builds advanced AI systems.
Anthropic is known for taking AI safety very seriously. Some of its former staff have publicly expressed concern about the risks of powerful AI systems developing too quickly.
Nvidia makes the semiconductor chips that power many AI systems used around the world. This makes Huang one of the most influential voices in the technology industry.
As the leader of such an important company, his opinion carries significant weight in debates about AI's future.
Huang has consistently promoted a positive vision of AI, believing it will bring major benefits to society rather than cause harm.
This is not the first time technology leaders have disagreed publicly about the dangers of AI. Some experts warn about existential risks, while others, like Huang, believe these fears are exaggerated.
The debate reflects a wider split in the tech industry. On one side are those who call for caution and stronger regulation. On the other are executives who argue that AI development should continue at speed.
As AI technology continues to advance rapidly, discussions about its risks and benefits are likely to become even more intense in the coming years.
Vocabulary10 words
- artificial intelligence
- computer systems built to think and act like humans
- doomsday narratives
- stories claiming something terrible will happen to everyone
- semiconductor chips
- small electronic parts that power computers and technology
- existential risks
- dangers that could end human life or civilization
- regulation
- official rules that control how something is done
- influential
- having a strong effect on people's opinions or actions
- reject
- to refuse to accept an idea
- advanced
- very modern and highly developed
- exaggerated
- made to seem bigger or worse than it really is
- debate
- a serious discussion where people disagree
Quiz
Answer key
1. There is a 0% chance 2. A former Anthropic researcher and others 3. False
โ Nice work on the quiz!
Keep the momentum going โ book a live English lesson with a Preply tutor.
Fill-in-the-blank listening
Play the audio again and fill in the missing words as you listen.
Jensen Huang, the head of the chip company Nvidia, has strongly _____ warnings that artificial intelligence could destroy the world by 2030.
Huang said there is a '_____' chance of this happening. He described such warnings as 'doomsday _____' that are not based on reality.
The warnings have come from several people, including a former researcher at _____, a company that builds advanced AI systems.
Anthropic is known for taking AI _____ very seriously. Some of its former staff have publicly expressed concern about the risks of powerful AI systems.
Nvidia makes the semiconductor _____ that power many AI systems used around the world. This makes Huang one of the most _____ voices in the technology industry.
Some experts warn about existential _____, while others, like Huang, believe these fears are _____.
The debate reflects a wider split in the tech industry, between those who call for caution and stronger _____ and those who want AI development to continue at speed.
Discussion questions
- Do you think AI could ever pose a serious risk to humanity? Why or why not?
- Why might a company boss like Jensen Huang want to reassure people about AI safety?
- Is it useful to have disagreement among experts about technology risks? Why?
- What kind of regulation, if any, do you think AI companies should follow?
More Technology stories
Next story ยท Medium
Wong Talks to Palestinian Minister; Queensland Premier Calls Visa Cuts โNutsโ


